Andries Brouwer <Andries.Brouwer@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 01:10:09AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote: > > * Andries Brouwer (aebr@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > No, there is no problem but an intentional change in behaviour in -mm > > > and now also in 2.6.11.8. > > > > I think this should be backed out of -stable. > > I was surprised to find it in, after I had written > > ============ > Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 21:58:07 +0200 > > For the time being, although I do not object to the patch, > obviously, since it is my own, I cannot see any reason to > add it to the "fixed" release. > ============ > > but maybe including it was done by mistake? > It wasn't mentioned, I think, in the changelog. > > There was a report that it fixed an oops, > but the report is unconfirmed and ununderstood. > > Should it be backed out of 2.6.11.8? Possibly - but if it will be > part of 2.6.12 or 2.6.13 then I would be inclined to leave it. > > Andrew asks whether it should be removed from -mm. It was merged into Linus's tree on March 8th (via bk, thank gawd. How do you find out that sort of info using git? Generating a full log is cheating). > Will first read all my mail and then reply to that letter. > Maybe you should coordinate with Andrew and take the same decision. I'm proposing that we revert that change from Linus's tree. - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
