On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 01:10:09AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote: > * Andries Brouwer (aebr@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > No, there is no problem but an intentional change in behaviour in -mm > > and now also in 2.6.11.8. > > I think this should be backed out of -stable. I was surprised to find it in, after I had written ============ Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 21:58:07 +0200 For the time being, although I do not object to the patch, obviously, since it is my own, I cannot see any reason to add it to the "fixed" release. ============ but maybe including it was done by mistake? It wasn't mentioned, I think, in the changelog. There was a report that it fixed an oops, but the report is unconfirmed and ununderstood. Should it be backed out of 2.6.11.8? Possibly - but if it will be part of 2.6.12 or 2.6.13 then I would be inclined to leave it. Andrew asks whether it should be removed from -mm. Will first read all my mail and then reply to that letter. Maybe you should coordinate with Andrew and take the same decision. Andries - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
