> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
> Sent: 06 June 2024 18:53
> To: Swathi K S <swathi.ks@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx;
> pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; richardcochran@xxxxxxxxx;
> alexandre.torgue@xxxxxxxxxxx; joabreu@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
> mcoquelin.stm32@xxxxxxxxx; alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> fsd@xxxxxxxxx; pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx; ravi.patel@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 'Jayati Sahu' <jayati.sahu@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
Siddharth
> Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@xxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] arm64: dts: fsd: Add Ethernet support for
FSYS0
> Block of FSD SoC
>
> > > > +ðernet_0 {
> > > > + status = "okay";
> > > > +
> > > > + fixed-link {
> > > > + speed = <1000>;
> > > > + full-duplex;
> > > > + };
> > > > +};
> > >
> > > A fixed link on its own is pretty unusual. Normally it is combined
> > > with an Ethernet switch. What is the link peer here?
> >
> > It is a direct connection to the Ethernet switch managed by an
> > external management unit.
>
> Ah, interesting. This is the third example of this in about a month. Take
a look at
> the Realtek and TI work in this area.
>
> So, i will ask the same questions i put to Realtek and TI. Does Linux know
about
> the switch in any way? Can it manage the switch, other than SNMP, HTTP
from
> user space? Does it know about the state of the ports, etc?
>
> If you say this is just a colocated management switch, which Linux is not
> managing in any way, that is O.K. If you have Linux involved in some way,
please
> join the discussion with TI about adding a new model for semi-autonomous
> switches.
Thanks for letting us know about the ongoing discussion.
But in this case, the switch is not managed by Linux.
>
> Andrew
Thanks,
Swathi
