On 19/02/2024 17:27, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Fri Feb 16, 2024 at 2:59 PM CET, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 16/02/2024 14:55, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >>> On 16.02.2024 14:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> The xlate callbacks are supposed to translate of_phandle_args to proper >>>> provider without modifying the of_phandle_args. Make the argument >>>> pointer to const for code safety and readability. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c | 2 +- >>>> drivers/interconnect/core.c | 4 ++-- >>>> drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-common.c | 3 ++- >>>> drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-common.h | 3 ++- >>>> drivers/interconnect/samsung/exynos.c | 2 +- >>>> drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c | 2 +- >>>> drivers/memory/tegra/tegra124-emc.c | 2 +- >>>> drivers/memory/tegra/tegra124.c | 2 +- >>>> drivers/memory/tegra/tegra186-emc.c | 2 +- >>>> drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c | 2 +- >>>> drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20.c | 2 +- >>>> drivers/memory/tegra/tegra30-emc.c | 2 +- >>>> drivers/memory/tegra/tegra30.c | 2 +- >>>> include/linux/interconnect-provider.h | 11 ++++++----- >>>> include/soc/tegra/mc.h | 7 ++++--- >>> >>> Ended up being a bit wider than just icc.. >>> >>> Looks sane apart from that >> >> Tegra memory controllers are also interconnect providers, so two subsystems. >> >> This patch should go via interconnect tree. > > I think Konrad might have been referring to the GPIO hunk, which seems > out of place. For the Tegra parts, though: Oh, that's right. I mixed up patches. Best regards, Krzysztof
