On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 9:54 AM Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/17/24 15:38, André Draszik wrote:
> >>>> + unsigned int max_count = port->fifosize;
> >>> What if port->fifosize is 0? Then this code below:
> >>>
> >>> while (max_count-- > 0) {
> >>>
> >>> would cause int overflow, if max_count is unsigned?
> >>>
> >> good catch, Sam!
> > Does it matter, though? As this is a post-decrement, the test is done first, and the
> > decrement after. Therefore, it'll still bail out as expected.
>
> Indeed, it doesn't. This reminds me of stop replying to emails at the
> end of the day :)
>
And it reminds me to drink some coffee in the morning before doing any
reviews :) With above condition sorted, feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cheers Andre'!
> ta
