On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 4:23 AM Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ``max_count`` negative values are not used. Since ``port->fifosize``
> is an unsigned int, make ``max_count`` the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
> index 90c49197efc7..dbbe6b8e3ceb 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
> @@ -760,8 +760,8 @@ static irqreturn_t s3c24xx_serial_rx_chars_dma(void *dev_id)
> static void s3c24xx_serial_rx_drain_fifo(struct s3c24xx_uart_port *ourport)
> {
> struct uart_port *port = &ourport->port;
> + unsigned int max_count = port->fifosize;
What if port->fifosize is 0? Then this code below:
while (max_count-- > 0) {
would cause int overflow, if max_count is unsigned?
> unsigned int fifocnt = 0;
> - int max_count = port->fifosize;
> u32 ufcon, ufstat, uerstat;
> u8 ch, flag;
>
> --
> 2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog
>
>
