Re: [PATCH v5 8/9] thermal: exynos: use BIT wherever possible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

> > @@ -590,15 +590,15 @@ static void exynos5433_tmu_control(struct platform_device *pdev, bool on)
> >                                   continue;
> >   
> >                           interrupt_en |=
> > -                                (1 << (EXYNOS7_TMU_INTEN_RISE0_SHIFT + i));
> > +                                BIT(EXYNOS7_TMU_INTEN_RISE0_SHIFT + i);
> >                   }
> >   
> >                   interrupt_en |=
> >                           interrupt_en << EXYNOS_TMU_INTEN_FALL0_SHIFT;
> >   
> > -                con |= (1 << EXYNOS_TMU_CORE_EN_SHIFT);
> > +                con |= BIT(EXYNOS_TMU_CORE_EN_SHIFT);
> >           } else
>
> Minor issue: the if-else segment here. When the 'if' has the
> brackets, then the 'else' should have them as well,
> even if there is only a single line under 'else'.
> It's not strictly to this patch, but you can address that
> later somewhere (just saw it here).

For what it's worth, this issue disappears after the final patch of this series,
because the other branch reduces to a single line too (all the interrupt_en
operations are done in the tmu_set_*_temp functions).

Thank you :)
Mateusz






[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]    
  • [Linux on Unisoc (RDA Micro) SoCs]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  •   Powered by Linux