Hi Mateusz,
On 11/20/23 14:50, Mateusz Majewski wrote:
The original driver did not use that macro and it allows us to make our
intentions slightly clearer.
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Majewski <m.majewski2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
[snip]
@@ -590,15 +590,15 @@ static void exynos5433_tmu_control(struct platform_device *pdev, bool on)
continue;
interrupt_en |=
- (1 << (EXYNOS7_TMU_INTEN_RISE0_SHIFT + i));
+ BIT(EXYNOS7_TMU_INTEN_RISE0_SHIFT + i);
}
interrupt_en |=
interrupt_en << EXYNOS_TMU_INTEN_FALL0_SHIFT;
- con |= (1 << EXYNOS_TMU_CORE_EN_SHIFT);
+ con |= BIT(EXYNOS_TMU_CORE_EN_SHIFT);
} else
Minor issue: the if-else segment here. When the 'if' has the
brackets, then the 'else' should have them as well,
even if there is only a single line under 'else'.
It's not strictly to this patch, but you can address that
later somewhere (just saw it here).
- con &= ~(1 << EXYNOS_TMU_CORE_EN_SHIFT);
+ con &= ~BIT(EXYNOS_TMU_CORE_EN_SHIFT);
pd_det_en = on ? EXYNOS5433_PD_DET_EN : 0;
@@ -622,17 +622,17 @@ static void exynos7_tmu_control(struct platform_device *pdev, bool on)
continue;
interrupt_en |=
- (1 << (EXYNOS7_TMU_INTEN_RISE0_SHIFT + i));
+ BIT(EXYNOS7_TMU_INTEN_RISE0_SHIFT + i);
}
interrupt_en |=
interrupt_en << EXYNOS_TMU_INTEN_FALL0_SHIFT;
- con |= (1 << EXYNOS_TMU_CORE_EN_SHIFT);
- con |= (1 << EXYNOS7_PD_DET_EN_SHIFT);
+ con |= BIT(EXYNOS_TMU_CORE_EN_SHIFT);
+ con |= BIT(EXYNOS7_PD_DET_EN_SHIFT);
} else {
- con &= ~(1 << EXYNOS_TMU_CORE_EN_SHIFT);
- con &= ~(1 << EXYNOS7_PD_DET_EN_SHIFT);
+ con &= ~BIT(EXYNOS_TMU_CORE_EN_SHIFT);
+ con &= ~BIT(EXYNOS7_PD_DET_EN_SHIFT);
}
writel(interrupt_en, data->base + EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_INTEN);
The patch LGTM,
Reviewed-by Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx>
Regards,
Lukasz