Re: [PATCH v12 00/18] drm: Add Samsung MIPI DSIM bridge

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14/02/2023 12.09, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Rasmus,
> 
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 7:55 AM Rasmus Villemoes
> <rasmus.villemoes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Well, the data sheet for the dsi86 says up to 750MHz DSI HS clock, and
>> if the value specified in samsung,burst-clock-frequency is twice the DSI
>> HS clk, I suppose I should be good up to 1.5GHz? I have tried many
>> different values, but I never seem to get anything through; I think I'm
>> missing some piece.
>>
>> So now I've tried to use these patches on the imx8mp-evk with the
>> mipi->hdmi accessory from NXP, just to see if I can ever get any
>> graphics through the mipi interface. And there the story is the same:
>> the adv7535 bridge gets probed, and can read out the edid from the
>> monitor over hdmi. And while the mipi block and the bridge seem to
>> attach to each other, I still don't get any output.
>>
>> Do any of you happen to have this working on the imx8mp-evk, and if so,
>> can you share the .dts updates you've done and how exactly you test the
>> graphics?
> 
> I don't have access to an imx8mp-evk, but I tested the ADV7535 MIPI to
> HDMI daughter card on an imx8mm-evk.
> 
> Some extra ADV7535 patches were needed. Please check patches 0020-0023
> and see if they help.

Thanks, but they don't seem to make a difference.

I've started trying to simply compare registers between the NXP 5.15
kernel and the imx8mm-dsi-v12 branch with Marek's patch on top. Already
in MEDIA_BLK_CTRL, 0x32ec0000, there's something interesting:

 ## Media Mix Clock Enable Register
-CLK_EN                 0004    0080e133
+CLK_EN                 0004    00800133
 ## MIPI PHY Control Register
-MIPI_RESET_DIV         0008    40030000
+MIPI_RESET_DIV         0008    00020000

So with the NXP kernel, there are three bits set in CLK_EN which are not
set with the "mainline", but those bits are marked reserved in the RM,
so I have no idea if they are just some RO bits that get set due to some
other munging. Then there's the MIPI_RESET_DIV register where bits 16
and 30 do not get set. Of course, there are lots of other differences,
but perhaps this gives somebody an idea.

Thanks,
Rasmu



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]    
  • [Linux on Unisoc (RDA Micro) SoCs]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  •   Powered by Linux