> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: clock: exynosautov9: correct clock
> numbering of peric0/c1
>
> On 27/06/2022 02:52, Chanho Park wrote:
> > There are duplicated definitions of peric0 and peric1 cmu blocks.
> > Thus, they should be defined correctly as numerical order.
> >
> > Fixes: 680e1c8370a2 ("dt-bindings: clock: add clock binding
> > definitions for Exynos Auto v9")
> > Signed-off-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../dt-bindings/clock/samsung,exynosautov9.h | 56
> > +++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,exynosautov9.h
> > b/include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,exynosautov9.h
> > index ea9f91b4eb1a..a7db6516593f 100644
> > --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,exynosautov9.h
> > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,exynosautov9.h
> > @@ -226,21 +226,21 @@
> > #define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_IPCLK_8 28
> > #define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_IPCLK_9 29
> > #define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_IPCLK_10 30
> > -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_IPCLK_11 30
> > -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_0 31
> > -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_1 32
> > -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_2 33
> > -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_3 34
> > -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_4 35
> > -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_5 36
> > -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_6 37
> > -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_7 38
> > -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_8 39
> > -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_9 40
> > -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_10 41
> > -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_11 42
> > +#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_IPCLK_11 31
> > +#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_0 32
> > +#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_1 33
>
> Is this a fix for current cycle? If yes, it's ok, otherwise all other IDs
> should not be changed, because it's part of ABI.
What is the current cycle? 5.19-rc or 5.20?
I prefer this goes on 5.19-rc but if it's not possible due to the ABI breakage, I'm okay this can be going to v5.20.
Best Regards,
Chanho Park
