On 27/06/2022 02:52, Chanho Park wrote:
> There are duplicated definitions of peric0 and peric1 cmu blocks. Thus,
> they should be defined correctly as numerical order.
>
> Fixes: 680e1c8370a2 ("dt-bindings: clock: add clock binding definitions for Exynos Auto v9")
> Signed-off-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../dt-bindings/clock/samsung,exynosautov9.h | 56 +++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,exynosautov9.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,exynosautov9.h
> index ea9f91b4eb1a..a7db6516593f 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,exynosautov9.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,exynosautov9.h
> @@ -226,21 +226,21 @@
> #define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_IPCLK_8 28
> #define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_IPCLK_9 29
> #define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_IPCLK_10 30
> -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_IPCLK_11 30
> -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_0 31
> -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_1 32
> -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_2 33
> -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_3 34
> -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_4 35
> -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_5 36
> -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_6 37
> -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_7 38
> -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_8 39
> -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_9 40
> -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_10 41
> -#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_11 42
> +#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_IPCLK_11 31
> +#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_0 32
> +#define CLK_GOUT_PERIC0_PCLK_1 33
Is this a fix for current cycle? If yes, it's ok, otherwise all other
IDs should not be changed, because it's part of ABI.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
