>-----Original Message----- >From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie@xxxxxxxxxx] >Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2022 8:32 PM >To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx> >Cc: 'Lee Jones' <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; >krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx; andi@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >linux-fsd@xxxxxxxxx; 'Adithya K V' <adithya.kv@xxxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 1/2] spi: dt-bindings: samsung: Add fsd spi >compatible > >On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 08:15:15PM +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote: > >> >There were changes adding the FSD SoC as well as DT stuff IIRC. > >> FSD SoC DT changes are already in -next. >> I think this can go with MFD tree because of immutable branch between >> MFD, SPI and DT due for the v5.18 merge windows. >> I am not sure if there are better ways to handle this. > >I need the changes that are hard dependencies to actually be in my tree so my >tree is not broken, -next isn't good enough here. If there are dependencies >for things you're posting you should explicitly say what they are when you >post (not just vauge statements that there are dependencies), and when you >post things that will be dependencies for other trees it's good to mention this >so that people can think about putting them on a separate branch for easier >cross merging. Sorry Mark for the noise. I should have clearly mentioned the dependencies. Surly I will keep this in mind for the future patches. Only dependency these two patches have on https://lore.kernel.org/all/YiYC7eYx2SpPILyl@xxxxxxxxxx/ spi: dt-bindings: samsung: Convert to dtschema which is now in MFD tree.