RE: [RESEND PATCH v3 1/2] spi: dt-bindings: samsung: Add fsd spi compatible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie@xxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2022 8:01 PM
>To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-arm-
>kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
>krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx; andi@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>linux-fsd@xxxxxxxxx; Adithya K V <adithya.kv@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 1/2] spi: dt-bindings: samsung: Add fsd spi
>compatible
>
>On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 01:58:03PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Tue, 08 Mar 2022, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>> > I either need a pull request for the MFD changes or to wait until
>> > those changes have come in via Linus' tree.
>
>> You mean this one:
>
>>   https://lore.kernel.org/all/YiYC7eYx2SpPILyl@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
>>   spi: dt-bindings: samsung: Convert to dtschema
>
>> Or something else?
>
>There were changes adding the FSD SoC as well as DT stuff IIRC.

FSD SoC DT changes are already in -next.
I think this can go with MFD tree because of immutable
branch between MFD, SPI and DT due for the v5.18 merge windows.
I am not sure if there are better ways to handle this.

Regards,
Alim






[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]    
  • [Linux on Unisoc (RDA Micro) SoCs]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  •   Powered by Linux