Hi Mark, On 10.10.2019 15:55, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 12:19:55PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote: >> On 09.10.2019 16:13, Mark Brown wrote: >>> We should revert the enable call, it shouldn't be required, and ideally >>> the default balancer could be updated to only make configuration changes >>> if they're actually required which would help avoid triggering any such >>> things in future if we don't absolutely have to. >> Okay, Then in case of regulator core - do you accept the initial patch >> as it indeed forces the default balancer to avoid unnecessary changes, >> or do you want me to rewrite it to assume min_uV = current_uV for the >> already enabled regulators during the initial balancing, like suggested >> by Dmitry? > Neither, I'm suggesting you make the change above. I've posted a revert: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/17/267 Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski, PhD Samsung R&D Institute Poland
