Hi Mark, On 09.10.2019 16:13, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:29:00PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > >> Okay, then what is the conclusion, as I got lost a bit? How do you want >> this issue to be fixed? > We should revert the enable call, it shouldn't be required, and ideally > the default balancer could be updated to only make configuration changes > if they're actually required which would help avoid triggering any such > things in future if we don't absolutely have to. Okay, Then in case of regulator core - do you accept the initial patch as it indeed forces the default balancer to avoid unnecessary changes, or do you want me to rewrite it to assume min_uV = current_uV for the already enabled regulators during the initial balancing, like suggested by Dmitry? Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski, PhD Samsung R&D Institute Poland
