On 09-10-19, 15:13, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:29:00PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > > > Okay, then what is the conclusion, as I got lost a bit? How do you want > > this issue to be fixed? > > We should revert the enable call, it shouldn't be required, and ideally > the default balancer could be updated to only make configuration changes > if they're actually required which would help avoid triggering any such > things in future if we don't absolutely have to. Sorry for the delay in responding, just came back after vacations. Should the OPP change be reverted ? Someone going to send that revert to me with the required explanation ? -- viresh
