Hi Chanwoo Choi,
On 11/23/18 12:54 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi Lukasz,
>
> I add one more comment about devfreq_resume_device().
>
> On 2018년 11월 22일 20:00, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/22/18 3:58 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>> On 2018년 11월 22일 03:01, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>>>> The patch adds support for handling suspend/resume process.
>>>> It uses atomic variables to make sure no race condition
>>>> affects the process.
>>>>
>>>> The patch draws on Tobias Jakobi's work posted ~2 years ago, who tried to
>>>> solve issue with devfreq device's frequency during suspend/resume.
>>>> During the discussion on LKML some corner cases and comments appeared
>>>> related to the design. This patch address them keeping in mind suggestions
>>>> from Chanwoo Choi.
>>>
>>> Please remove the duplicate information about patch history.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Suggested-by: Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Suggested-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <l.luba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>>> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
>>>> index cf9c643..7e09de8 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
>>>> @@ -872,14 +872,33 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(devm_devfreq_remove_device);
>>>> */
>>>> int devfreq_suspend_device(struct devfreq *devfreq)
>>>> {
>>>> - if (!devfreq)
>>>> - return -EINVAL;
>>>> + int ret;
>>>
>>> Move 'ret' definition under 'if (devfreq->suspend_freq) {'
>>> because 'ret' is used if suspend_freq isn't zero.
>> Not only there, 6 lines above 'ret' is used for
>> devfreq->governor->event_handler().
>
> OK.
>
>>>
>>>> + unsigned long prev_freq;
>>>> + u32 flags = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!devfreq)
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (devfreq->governor) {
>>>> + ret = devfreq->governor->event_handler(devfreq,
>>>> + DEVFREQ_GOV_SUSPEND, NULL);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>>
>>>> - if (!devfreq->governor)
>>>> - return 0;
>>>> + if (devfreq->suspend_freq) {
>>>> + if (atomic_inc_return(&devfreq->suspend_count) > 1)
>>>> + return 0;
>>>>
>>>> - return devfreq->governor->event_handler(devfreq,
>>>> - DEVFREQ_GOV_SUSPEND, NULL);
>>>> + ret = devfreq_set_target(devfreq, devfreq->suspend_freq,
>>>> + &prev_freq, flags);
>>>
>>> Remove the 'prev_freq' parameter.
>> OK
>>>
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + devfreq->resume_freq = prev_freq;
>>>
>>> As I commented on patch2, if devfreq_set_taget save the current frequency
>>> to 'devfreq->resume_freq', this line is not needed.
>> OK
>>>
>>>
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> }
>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(devfreq_suspend_device);
>>>>
>>>> @@ -893,9 +912,23 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(devfreq_suspend_device);
>>>> */
>>>> int devfreq_resume_device(struct devfreq *devfreq)
>>>> {
>>>> + int ret;
>>>
>>> Move 'ret' definition under 'if (devfreq->suspend_freq) {'
>>> because 'ret' is used if suspend_freq isn't zero.
>> OK
>
> If you change the devfreq_resume_device() according to my new comment,
> please ignore it.
>
>>>
>>>> + unsigned long prev_freq;
>>>
>>> Remove prev_freq variable which is not used on this function.
>>> After calling devfreq_set_target, prev_freq is not used.
>> OK
>>>
>>>> + u32 flags = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> if (!devfreq)
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>>
>>>> + if (devfreq->suspend_freq) {
>>>> + if (atomic_dec_return(&devfreq->suspend_count) >= 1)
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = devfreq_set_target(devfreq, devfreq->resume_freq,
>>>> + &prev_freq, flags);
>>>
>>> Remove the 'prev_freq' parameter.
>> OK
>>>
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> if (!devfreq->governor)
>>>> return 0;
>
> Please change the code as following because you uses the following type
> in the devfreq_suspend_device(). If there is any special issue, please
> keep the same format in order to improve the readability.
>
> if (devfreq->governor) {
> ret = devfreq->governor->event_handler(devfreq,
> DEVFREQ_GOV_RESUME, NULL);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
>
>
OK, I will change the code to keep the same format.
Thank you for the review.
Regards,
Lukasz
