Hi Laurent,
On 2017-08-11 11:40, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Marek,
On Friday 11 Aug 2017 08:39:31 Marek Szyprowski wrote:
On 2017-08-10 15:39, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Thursday 10 Aug 2017 15:25:29 Maciej Purski wrote:
The driver should be switched on if an external connector is plugged and
switched off if it is unplugged. Extcon is optional. If it is not found,
the driver stays in "always-on" mode.
Signed-off-by: Maciej Purski <m.purski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../bindings/display/bridge/sil-sii8620.txt | 4 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/sil-sii8620.c | 83 ++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/sil-sii8620.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/sil-sii8620.txt index
9409d9c..1f230bf 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/sil-sii8620.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/sil-sii8620.txt
@@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ Required properties:
- clocks, clock-names: specification and name of "xtal" clock
- video interfaces: Device node can contain video interface port
node for HDMI encoder according to [1].
+Optional properties:
+ - extcon: phandle to external connector for MHL cable changes
+ detection
The sii8620 DT node should model its connection to the MHL connector using
OF graph, connecting a port to the MHL connector DT node through
endpoints. I believe the extcon property should then be added to the MHL
connector DT node, not the bridge.
I don't get this. Generic extcon bindings doesn't define connector DT
node, so I don't see how could we use endpoint DT approach here. Could you
give the example?
Sure, here you are.
&hsi2c_7 {
...
sii8620@39 {
reg = <0x39>;
compatible = "sil,sii8620";
cvcc10-supply = <&ldo36_reg>;
iovcc18-supply = <&ldo34_reg>;
interrupt-parent = <&gpf0>;
interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
reset-gpios = <&gpv7 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
clocks = <&pmu_system_controller 0>;
clock-names = "xtal";
ports {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
port@0 {
reg = <0>;
mhl_to_hdmi: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&hdmi_to_mhl>;
};
};
port@1 {
reg = <1>;
mhl_bridge_out: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&mhl_connector_in>;
};
};
};
};
};
/ {
mhl-connector {
compatible = "mhl-connector";
extcon = <&muic>;
port {
mhl_connector_in: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&mhl_bridge_out>;
};
};
};
};
Note that there's currently no DT binding for MHL connectors. One needs to be
developed, the HDMI connector DT binding can be used as a source of
inspiration.
Ah, I see. I wasn't aware that display subsystem has bindings even for
the connectors.
Other types of connectors already used together with extcon in device
tree (like usb
and chargers) don't have dedicated bindings.
Do we need to add hdmi-connectors to all existing boards that have HDMI
module?
[1]: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
