On 19/11/14 04:37, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>> >
>>> > > +static int exynos5440_clk_restart_notify(struct notifier_block *this,
>>> > > + unsigned long code, void *unused)
>>> > > +{
>>> > > + u32 val, status;
>>> > > +
>>> > > + status = readl_relaxed(reg_base + 0xbc);
>>> > > + val = readl_relaxed(reg_base + 0xcc);
>>> > > + val = (val & 0xffff0000) | (status & 0xffff);
>>> > > + writel_relaxed(val, reg_base + 0xcc);
>> >
>> > Can we have macro definitions for these 0xcc, 0xbc address offsets ?
>> > I must say I couldn't find them documented in any Exynos datasheet I've
> got though.
>> >
>
> I also wished this, but I could not find them documented.
> So I tried to keep logic of original code as it is, just changed location.
> I would also like to mention that I have not tested this on exynos5440 as I
> do not have
> one with me. I believe if it was working at its original place in
> exynos_restart it should work
> here also. Other patch (2/2) I have verified on Exynos3250 board and its
> working well.
I think it's best to merge both patches in that series through
the arm-soc tree, since applying them not in order may cause some
breakage. Thus I'd let Kukjin take this patch set into his tree.
For both patches:
Acked-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx>
--
Thanks,
Sylwester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
