Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] clk: samsung: exynos5440: move restart code into clock driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 18/11/14 11:47, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> Let's register restart handler for Exynos5440 from it's clock driver
> for restart functionality. So that we can cleanup restart hooks from
> machine specific file.
> 
> CC: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

The patch looks good to me.

Acked-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Just one comment below.

> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c        |   19 +------------------
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5440.c |   29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> index 8f638ad..8f995b7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> @@ -89,24 +89,7 @@ static struct map_desc exynos5_iodesc[] __initdata = {
>  
>  static void exynos_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
>  {
> -	struct device_node *np;
> -	u32 val = 0x1;
> -	void __iomem *addr = pmu_base_addr + EXYNOS_SWRESET;
> -
> -	if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5440")) {
> -		u32 status;
> -		np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "samsung,exynos5440-clock");
> -
> -		addr = of_iomap(np, 0) + 0xbc;
> -		status = __raw_readl(addr);
> -
> -		addr = of_iomap(np, 0) + 0xcc;
> -		val = __raw_readl(addr);
> -
> -		val = (val & 0xffff0000) | (status & 0xffff);
> -	}
> -
> -	__raw_writel(val, addr);
> +	__raw_writel(0x1, pmu_base_addr + EXYNOS_SWRESET);
>  }
>  

> +static int exynos5440_clk_restart_notify(struct notifier_block *this,
> +		unsigned long code, void *unused)
> +{
> +	u32 val, status;
> +
> +	status = readl_relaxed(reg_base + 0xbc);
> +	val = readl_relaxed(reg_base + 0xcc);
> +	val = (val & 0xffff0000) | (status & 0xffff);
> +	writel_relaxed(val, reg_base + 0xcc);

Can we have macro definitions for these 0xcc, 0xbc address offsets ?
I must say I couldn't find them documented in any Exynos datasheet
I've got though.

> +	return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +}

--
Regards,
Sylwester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux