Hello Wolfram, On 09/11/2014 01:35 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> > This is a workaround. It would make sense, however, to add it because we >> > want to support i2c_board_info structures. >> > >> >> I think it really depends if an IP block can be used on non-DT platforms >> (which I think is true for this trackpad) but if a driver is for an IP block >> that can only be used on a DT-only platform (e.g: a PMIC that is controlled >> over I2C and is only compatible with a DT-only SoC) then I don't think we need >> to support the i2c_board_info structure and can get rid of the I2C ID table on >> these drivers once Lee series land. > > That is exactly what I meant. It should be only added if there is a > reason other than "workaround". If you say, it doesn't make sense on > non-DT, then it should not be added. > Sorry for explaining myself badly. I just tried to say that this is a decision that has to be made on a per-driver basis but I don't really know if makes sense or not in this case since I don't know if this device is (or could be) shipped on non-DT platforms. Nick is in a much better position to answer that question. Best regards, Javier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |