Hi Tomasz, On 10 March 2014 05:29, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08.03.2014 10:24, Pankaj Dubey wrote: >> >> Hi Rahul, > > >> I modified code as per our discussion and addressed all comments >> including moving fixed clock to DT >> and found it's working well, so we can now finalize which way to go >> ahead. >> Following is some data between V4 and probable next version, which might >> help in making decision. >> >> drivers/clk/samsung/exynos5260-clock.c >> >> Before Change >> LoC: 1890 >> size drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.o >> text data bss dec hex filename >> 14226 14956 0 29182 71fe >> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.o >> >> After Change: >> LoC: 1806 >> size drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.o >> text data bss dec hex filename >> 15446 14544 0 29990 7526 >> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.o > > > Well, somehow I've been under impression that the change would bring more > significant results. Here we can see slight reduction in lines of code, but > also slight increase of kernel image size. Still, in general, nothing > extreme. > > In this case I'd probably go with Rahul's original code, as it doesn't > require second matching and separate match table, which adds redundant > compatible strings used just for this extra matching pass. > > I guess this is all just bike shedding, though. yea. I understand. Will proceed as you said. Regards, Rahul Sharma > > Best regards, > Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |