On 08.03.2014 10:24, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
Hi Rahul,
I modified code as per our discussion and addressed all comments
including moving fixed clock to DT
and found it's working well, so we can now finalize which way to go ahead.
Following is some data between V4 and probable next version, which might
help in making decision.
drivers/clk/samsung/exynos5260-clock.c
Before Change
LoC: 1890
size drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.o
text data bss dec hex filename
14226 14956 0 29182 71fe
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.o
After Change:
LoC: 1806
size drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.o
text data bss dec hex filename
15446 14544 0 29990 7526
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.o
Well, somehow I've been under impression that the change would bring
more significant results. Here we can see slight reduction in lines of
code, but also slight increase of kernel image size. Still, in general,
nothing extreme.
In this case I'd probably go with Rahul's original code, as it doesn't
require second matching and separate match table, which adds redundant
compatible strings used just for this extra matching pass.
I guess this is all just bike shedding, though.
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
