On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:33:19PM +0530, Padma Venkat wrote: > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Why don't we need this fix for mainline? The dmaengine change is just > > moving the initialisation through a layer of indirection but there was > > initialisation anyway. I'm concerned that there's a bug that ought to > > be fixed for v3.13 as well here. > Yes. We need this for mainline. Not dependent on your dmaengine changes. Ah, just saw this one - I'll cook up a version of it, due to the refactoring the change doesn't apply directly to v3.13. > >> return snd_dmaengine_pcm_register(dev, &samsung_dmaengine_pcm_config, > >> - SND_DMAENGINE_PCM_FLAG_COMPAT); > >> + SND_DMAENGINE_PCM_FLAG_COMPAT | > >> + SND_DMAENGINE_PCM_FLAG_CUSTOM_CHANNEL_NAME); > > This is already done. > Should I send another patch by removing this flag from this patch? No need.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
