On 19 November 2013 18:59, Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Frequency lock should be considered in suspend/hibernation.
These could turn out to be important logs for future. Please write
with more effort..
> Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> index f3c2287..cd05b0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> @@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *notifier,
> int ret;
>
> switch (pm_event) {
> + case PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE:
> case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE:
> mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock);
> frequency_locked = true;
> @@ -198,6 +199,8 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *notifier,
>
> break;
>
> + case PM_POST_HIBERNATION:
> + case PM_POST_RESTORE:
> case PM_POST_SUSPEND:
> mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock);
> frequency_locked = false;
@Rafael: So we have few more drivers which are already doing such
stuff (even tegra as well)..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
