[PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: exynos: Consider hibernation in pm notifier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Frequency lock should be considered in suspend/hibernation.

Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
index f3c2287..cd05b0a 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
@@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *notifier,
 	int ret;
 
 	switch (pm_event) {
+	case PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE:
 	case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE:
 		mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock);
 		frequency_locked = true;
@@ -198,6 +199,8 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *notifier,
 
 		break;
 
+	case PM_POST_HIBERNATION:
+	case PM_POST_RESTORE:
 	case PM_POST_SUSPEND:
 		mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock);
 		frequency_locked = false;
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux