Hi Naveen, On Thursday 07 of November 2013 11:22:42 Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote: > On Exynos5250, the FALL interrupt related en, status and clear bits are > available at an offset of > 16 in INTEN, INTSTAT registers and at an offset of > 12 in INTCLEAR register. > > On Exynos5420, the FALL interrupt related en, status and clear bits are > available at an offset of > 16 in INTEN, INTSTAT and INTCLEAR registers. > > On Exynos5440, > the FALL_IRQEN bits are at an offset of 4 > and the RISE_IRQEN bits are at an offset of 0 > > This patch introduces a new bit field intclr_fall_shift to handle the > offset for exyns5250 and exynos5440 > Also removes the unused macros EXYNOS_TMU_FALL_INT_SHIFT and > EXYNOS5440_TMU_FALL_INT_SHIFT, inten_fall_shift field >From what I can see in this patch, the field intclr_fall_shift is not really introduced, but rather inten_fall_shift is renamed to it. Please match patch description with what the patch actually does. I believe this patch is also touches code and data related to Exynos 4x12 SoCs, but the description only covers Exynos 5 SoCs. In addition, if this patch does not introduce any functional changes, but only refactors some code, the description should say so. Also, please see my comment below. > Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Changes since v1: > Changes since v2: > Changes since v3: > None > Changes since v4: > Correct the CLEAR_FALL_INT_SHIFT for Exynos5250/Exynos5440 > Changes since v5: > Modify the commit message > Changes since v6: > - Use EXYNOS_TMU_CLEAR_FALL_INT_SHIFT instead of EXYNOS5250_TMU_CLEAR_FALL_INT_SHIFT > as the same is being used for Exynos4412 > Changes since v7: > - also removes the unused macros EXYNOS_TMU_FALL_INT_SHIFT and > EXYNOS5440_TMU_FALL_INT_SHIFT, inten_fall_shift field > > > drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 2 +- > drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h | 4 ++-- > drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.h | 4 ++-- > 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c > index 32f38b9..b2202fa 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c > @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ skip_calib_data: > data->base + reg->threshold_th1); > > writel((reg->inten_rise_mask << reg->inten_rise_shift) | > - (reg->inten_fall_mask << reg->inten_fall_shift), > + (reg->inten_fall_mask << reg->intclr_fall_shift), Shouldn't also the mask values be called intclr_*_mask? They seem to be used only with tmu_intclear register. Same goes for inten_fall_shift, Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |