Hi Naveen,
On Thursday 07 of November 2013 18:37:49 Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
> Exynos5420 SoC has per core thermal management unit.
> 5 TMU channels 4 for CPUs and 5th for GPU.
>
> This patch adds the device tree nodes to the DT device list.
>
> Nodes carry the misplaced second base address and the second
> clock to access the misplaced base address.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala <l.krishna@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> 1. Nodes carry the misplaced second base address and the second
> clock to access the misplaced base address.
> 2. Correct the clock number for the TMU4
First of all, this patch should be a part of the whole series adding
support for thermal on Exynos 5420.
In addition, see my comment below.
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
> index 6ffefd1..d736b40 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
> @@ -369,4 +369,52 @@
> clock-names = "gscl";
> samsung,power-domain = <&gsc_pd>;
> };
> +
> + /* tmu for CPU0 */
> + tmu@10060000 {
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-tmu";
> + reg = <0x10060000 0x100>;
> + interrupts = <0 65 0>;
> + clocks = <&clock 318>;
> + clock-names = "tmu_apbif";
> + };
> +
> + /* tmu for CPU1 */
> + tmu@10064000 {
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-tmu";
> + reg = <0x10064000 0x100>;
> + interrupts = <0 183 0>;
> + clocks = <&clock 318>;
> + clock-names = "tmu_apbif";
> + };
> +
> + /* tmu for CPU2 */
> + tmu@10068000 {
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-tmu";
> + /* 2nd reg is for the misplaced TRIMINFO register */
Instead of this comment, such broken TMU variant should use a separate
compatible value, like "samsung,exynos5420-tmu-broken-triminfo", like
I mentioned in my comments to your other patch.
For this compatible value, both second reg entry and second clock would
be required.
> + reg = <0x10068000 0x100>, <0x1006c000 0x4>;
> + interrupts = <0 184 0>;
> + clocks = <&clock 318>;
> + clock-names = "tmu_apbif";
> + };
> +
> + /* tmu for CPU3 */
> + tmu@1006c000 {
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-tmu";
> + /* 2nd reg is for the misplaced TRIMINFO register */
> + reg = <0x1006c000 0x100>, <0x100a0000 0x4>;
> + interrupts = <0 185 0>;
> + clocks = <&clock 318>, <&clock 319>;
> + clock-names = "tmu_apbif", "tmu_apbif_triminfo";
The "tmu_apbif_triminfo" clock is not specified in exynos-thermal binding
documentation. In addition, the patch of yours adding support for second
clock uses another name - "tmu_apbif_sec".
As for the name itself, I would prefer "tmu_apbif_triminfo" as it's more
meaningful.
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
