Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Update vdd_arm regulator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/10/2013 09:14 AM, Tushar Behera wrote:
> On 06/08/2013 05:22 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> Hi Tushar,
>>
>> On Thursday 06 of June 2013 16:32:52 Tushar Behera wrote:
>>> Cpufreq driver for EXYNOS4210 is not a platform driver, hence it is not
>>> possible to provide the regulator supply name through DT bindings.
>>> Since the cpufreq driver requires the regulator to be named as
>>> 'vdd_arm', the related regulator name should be kept same.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts |    2 +-
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts
>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts index bcf8079..bd5f589 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts
>>> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@
>>>  				};
>>>
>>>  				buck1_reg: BUCK1 {
>>> -					regulator-name = "VDD_ARM_1.2V";
>>> +					regulator-name = "vdd_arm";
>>
>> Yes, this is the hack I mentioned in my review of
>> [PATCH 0/2] Clock update for EXYNOS4210-CPUFREQ driver
>>
> 
> We can hold this patch till we get to a conclusion for the above
> mentioned patch set.
> 
Kukjin,

We have agreed to go ahead with this approach till the cpufreq driver
has not been modified.

Can you please take this patch now?

-- 
Tushar Behera
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux