Hi Tushar,
On Thursday 06 of June 2013 16:32:52 Tushar Behera wrote:
> Cpufreq driver for EXYNOS4210 is not a platform driver, hence it is not
> possible to provide the regulator supply name through DT bindings.
> Since the cpufreq driver requires the regulator to be named as
> 'vdd_arm', the related regulator name should be kept same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts index bcf8079..bd5f589 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts
> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@
> };
>
> buck1_reg: BUCK1 {
> - regulator-name = "VDD_ARM_1.2V";
> + regulator-name = "vdd_arm";
Yes, this is the hack I mentioned in my review of
[PATCH 0/2] Clock update for EXYNOS4210-CPUFREQ driver
Best regards,
Tomasz
> regulator-min-microvolt =
<950000>;
> regulator-max-microvolt =
<1350000>;
> regulator-always-on;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
