On 06/08/2013 05:22 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Tushar,
>
> On Thursday 06 of June 2013 16:32:52 Tushar Behera wrote:
>> Cpufreq driver for EXYNOS4210 is not a platform driver, hence it is not
>> possible to provide the regulator supply name through DT bindings.
>> Since the cpufreq driver requires the regulator to be named as
>> 'vdd_arm', the related regulator name should be kept same.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts
>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts index bcf8079..bd5f589 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts
>> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@
>> };
>>
>> buck1_reg: BUCK1 {
>> - regulator-name = "VDD_ARM_1.2V";
>> + regulator-name = "vdd_arm";
>
> Yes, this is the hack I mentioned in my review of
> [PATCH 0/2] Clock update for EXYNOS4210-CPUFREQ driver
>
We can hold this patch till we get to a conclusion for the above
mentioned patch set.
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
>
>> regulator-min-microvolt =
> <950000>;
>> regulator-max-microvolt =
> <1350000>;
>> regulator-always-on;
--
Tushar Behera
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
