On 23 April 2013 20:55, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/05/13 20:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> On Friday, April 05, 2013 12:36:34 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: >>> >>> On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kim<kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be re-worked based >>>> on >>>> for-next of samsung tree because this touches too many samsung stuff so >>>> this >>>> should be sent to upstream via samsung tree. >>> >>> >>> Hmm... Its already applied in Rafael's tree. But it doesn't mean that >>> it can't be >>> moved to your tree if there is a issue. >> >> >> Well, I'm dropping it. Please merge via the Samsung tree. >> > > Oops, I missed, maybe I have no more chance to send this to upstream for > upcoming merge window :-( > > Rafael, please take this patch with my ack in your tree, sorry for noise. > > Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > If any problems, please kindly let me know. Who is going to pick this patch now for next merge window? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |