Re: [PATCH 07/18] cpufreq: s3c24xx: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be re-worked based on
> for-next of samsung tree because this touches too many samsung stuff so this
> should be sent to upstream via samsung tree.

Hmm... Its already applied in Rafael's tree. But it doesn't mean that
it can't be
moved to your tree if there is a issue.

What tree/branch? I used:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git for-next

> Applying: cpufreq: s3c24xx: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq
> error: patch failed: arch/arm/Kconfig:2166
> error: arch/arm/Kconfig: patch does not apply

above two are obvious as you haven't applied other patches in this series.

> error: patch failed: arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Kconfig:28
> error: arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Kconfig: patch does not apply
> error: patch failed: arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Makefile:17
> error: arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Makefile: patch does not apply
> error: patch failed: drivers/cpufreq/Makefile:63
> error: drivers/cpufreq/Makefile: patch does not apply

Same here.

> error: drivers/cpufreq/s3c2412-cpufreq.c: does not exist in index

I can still see it in for-next.

Attached is my patch based of your for-next

Attachment: 0001-cpufreq-s3c24xx-move-cpufreq-driver-to-drivers-cpufr.patch
Description: Binary data


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux