Olof Johansson wrote: > > Kukjin, > Hi Olof, [...] > > And let me send pull-request again for fix and late dt branch with > separated > > branches in a couple of hours not including usb stuff... > > Refresh my memory here, what was the reason for dropping the USB DTS > updates? (Yes, I am aware it might because I asked you not to send > them in but I don't remember :-). > Hmm...let me see, yeah, the USB DTS updates dropped because of late pull-request stuff as you concerned. http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg240105.html Since I didn't want to make a noise at that time, so I dropped for v3.10, it has been included in my tree for some time though. > Also, when you drop stuff, please, please don't keep it in your own Ooops, it's my mistake. I didn't updated my tree not in my local :-( > for-next branch. The end result is that we'll keep testing something > on linux-next with the anticipation that it will work when it lands in > the merge window, when that's not the truth if you're not going to > send the pull requests up. > > So, if you decide to keep code like this out of the merge window (or > if we push back at it and say no to it), then remove it from your > for-next branch as well. > Perfectly right and I agree. > In particular, the usb phy node for usb2 would ber very good to get in > for 3.10, since it's a critical piece to get usb2 working on the > Chromebook. > Yes, I think so, let me sort them out. Thanks. - Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |