Linus, On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> ...I think the most important issue at hand is the device tree >> bindings for pinmux on this device. It sounds like you are in >> agreement that the best thing is to have a pinmux specified per-slot. > > I don't know, Stephen's point to have one single pinctrl set-up for the > entire device seems perfectly valid, why do you need to specify it > per-slot at all? OK by me. It seemed more "pure" to specify it per-slot (in case we ever did have a struct device per slot, it would make live easier). ...but it doesn't seem incorrect to have it once for the entire device. :) -Doug P.S. sorry for double mail for some people... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |