Re: State of pinctrl and exynos5250?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> ...I think the most important issue at hand is the device tree
> bindings for pinmux on this device.  It sounds like you are in
> agreement that the best thing is to have a pinmux specified per-slot.

I don't know, Stephen's point to have one single pinctrl set-up for the
entire device seems perfectly valid, why do you need to specify it
per-slot at all?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux