Joonyoung Shim wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 12/10/2012 10:07 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-
> exynos/common.c
> > index 0eb3b9a..9ecda37 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
> > @@ -684,7 +684,8 @@ void __init exynos5_init_irq(void)
> > * Theses parameters should be NULL and 0 because EXYNOS4
> > * uses GIC instead of VIC.
> > */
> > - s5p_init_irq(NULL, 0);
> > + if (!of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5440"))
> > + s5p_init_irq(NULL, 0);
>
> How about remove to call s5p_init_irq() here because All exynos SoCs use
> GIC instead of VIC?
>
NO, the current s5p_init_irq() is not only for VIC but also Timer which is
used on EXYNOS SoCs, I know the name is strange...
> > gic_arch_extn.irq_set_wake = s3c_irq_wake;
> > }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
