On 12/19/2012 12:26 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Joonyoung Shim wrote:
Hi,
On 12/10/2012 10:07 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-
exynos/common.c
index 0eb3b9a..9ecda37 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
@@ -684,7 +684,8 @@ void __init exynos5_init_irq(void)
* Theses parameters should be NULL and 0 because EXYNOS4
* uses GIC instead of VIC.
*/
- s5p_init_irq(NULL, 0);
+ if (!of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5440"))
+ s5p_init_irq(NULL, 0);
How about remove to call s5p_init_irq() here because All exynos SoCs use
GIC instead of VIC?
NO, the current s5p_init_irq() is not only for VIC but also Timer which is
used on EXYNOS SoCs, I know the name is strange...
I think timer can be selective by MCT on Exynos SoCs.
The patch(ARM: EXYNOS: remove static mapping of PWM memory) is for it.
gic_arch_extn.irq_set_wake = s3c_irq_wake;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
