Olof Johansson wrote:
[...]
> Looks like the breakage was caused by the following commit:
>
> commit 1974a042dd15f1f007a3a1a2dd7a23ca0e42c01d
> Author: Padmavathi Venna <padma.v@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> AuthorDate: Wed Nov 28 16:17:48 2012 +0530
> Commit: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CommitDate: Wed Nov 28 19:18:00 2012 +0000
>
> ASoC: Samsung: Get I2S src_clk from clock alias id.
>
> Padmavathi, you can't send out code that breaks all Samsung platforms
> like this, even if there are patches out there that fixes it. Changes
> have to be bisectable, which means that you can't break and unbreak
> the build, least of all if you merge through different maintainers.
> And you need to tell the other maintainer that there are dependent
> patches, you just sent the above patch to Mark without any such
> information.
>
Oops, I thought the 'src_clk' should be restored with my drop the commit
48a2050d ("ARM: SAMSUNG: Delete the unnecessary variable"), however, seems
other patch has same changes...What's happening?
See below,
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-November/134979.h
tml
> Kukjin, I see that Padmavathi has posted a V3 series of patches to
> remove all this from the dev-audio files on November 23. Are you ok
> with us picking them up and sending ASAP?
>
Hmm, just Mark's following can fix it but I didn't look at it yet.
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-November/134911.h
tml
- Kukjin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
