Kukjin Kim wrote:
>
> Olof Johansson wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Looks like the breakage was caused by the following commit:
> >
> > commit 1974a042dd15f1f007a3a1a2dd7a23ca0e42c01d
> > Author: Padmavathi Venna <padma.v@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > AuthorDate: Wed Nov 28 16:17:48 2012 +0530
> > Commit: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > CommitDate: Wed Nov 28 19:18:00 2012 +0000
> >
> > ASoC: Samsung: Get I2S src_clk from clock alias id.
> >
> > Padmavathi, you can't send out code that breaks all Samsung platforms
> > like this, even if there are patches out there that fixes it. Changes
> > have to be bisectable, which means that you can't break and unbreak
> > the build, least of all if you merge through different maintainers.
> > And you need to tell the other maintainer that there are dependent
> > patches, you just sent the above patch to Mark without any such
> > information.
> >
> Oops, I thought the 'src_clk' should be restored with my drop the commit
> 48a2050d ("ARM: SAMSUNG: Delete the unnecessary variable"), however,
> seems other patch has same changes...What's happening?
>
> See below,
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-
> November/134979.html
>
> > Kukjin, I see that Padmavathi has posted a V3 series of patches to
> > remove all this from the dev-audio files on November 23. Are you ok
> > with us picking them up and sending ASAP?
> >
> Hmm, just Mark's following can fix it but I didn't look at it yet.
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-
> November/134911.html
>
Olof, I sent 'git pull request' for fix the problems just now, please check
it.
Thanks.
- Kukjin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
