Hi Thomas, On Wed, Aug 22 2012, Thomas Abraham wrote: >> none -> currently "samsung,sdhci-cd-internal" >> broken-cd -> currently "samsung,sdhci-cd-none" >> cd-gpios -> currently "samsung,sdhci-cd-gpios" >> non-removable -> currently "samsung,sdhci-cd-permanent" >> cd-gpios + samsung,sdhci-cd-external -> currently "samsung,sdhci-cd-external" >> >> How does that sound? > > Not quite there yet. It is not possible to leave out cd-gpios for > "samsung,sdhci-cd-internal" since the current Samsung pinmux > configuration piggybacks on gpio dt binding. Can we use the following > instead. > > none -> currently "samsung,sdhci-cd-none" > broken-cd -> currently "samsung,sdhci-cd-none" > cd-gpios -> currently "samsung,sdhci-cd-gpios" > non-removable -> currently "samsung,sdhci-cd-permanent" > cd-gpios + samsung,sdhci-cd-internal -> currently "samsung,sdhci-cd-internal" I see. Okay; unless anyone has better ideas, it sounds like you should go ahead and do that -- with something like this in your binding docs: "This binding differs from the core MMC binding by requiring a cd-gpios property to be present to use internal card-detection. If no cd-gpios are present (and "non-removable" is missing) the driver will poll for card-detection as if a "broken-cd" property was provided." I'll send out the new core bindings doc shortly. Finishing off another thread -- the "samsung-sdhci.txt" name is okay. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |