On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 04:42:08PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Sadly, what a mess!!! > > > > Jassi, you don't own the copyright, your company did, as they employed > > you to do the job. So both your and Kukjin are not correct in claiming > > the copyright!! > > > Read the thread again. > Nobody is claiming the copyright, it rests with Samsung as before. > > Kukjin thinks merging two files is a serious enough change to > warrant co-authorship, which I disagree. Get a clue. Reading the patch. Kukjin isn't claiming co-authorship. Boojin is. Different person. > I am equally pissed off by the fact that Kukjin/Boojin sneaked in the > co-authorship in this revision while carrying over the Acked-by's from > previous revision as if it has already been approved by others. Go and check the file history, and you'll see it's justified. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |