On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Can't you read this ? ..... >> > As I know, the Copyright can belong to a person or company. See my patches in mainline. I meant that. Of course, it depends on writer. > >> ------------------------- >> /* linux/drivers/dma/pl330.c >> * >> * Copyright (C) 2010 Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. >> * Jaswinder Singh <jassi.brar@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> * >> ------------------------- >> >> I challenge you to show 1 file that I wrote while in Samsung which >> doesn't show Samsung as the copyright holder. >> > > See above. > What crap, dude ?! So you mean (a) is correct crediting while (b), which already exists, doesn't give enough credit to Samsung ? Bloody double standards ! (a) + * Copyright (c) 2012 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. + * http://www.samsung.com + * Boojin Kim <boojin.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> (b) * Copyright (C) 2010 Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. * Jaswinder Singh <jassi.brar@xxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |