Grant Likely wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:04:53AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 05:47:48AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Saturday 11 February 2012, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 08:07:08PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > what the risk is in changing exynos4 at the same time. It would > > > > > be great if we can have all exynos use the common struct clk in 3.4, > > > > > but I'm also happy if we just get exynos5 to do it that way from the > > > > > beginning and move exynos4 over in 3.5 after you have had a chance > > > > > to make sure everything still works. > > > > > > > > Are we likely to get the common struct clk in 3.4? It's all been > > > > extremely quiet on that front except for complaints about the lack of > > > > progress. > > > > > > Yes, we discussed it during the subarch maintainers meeting at Linaro > > > Connect last week and it looks like we're finally going forward on > > > this now. Maybe Grant or Mike are better at explaining the current > > > status regarding the clk implementation and bindings. > > > > That would be good for those who weren't there to be updated with what > > was discussed. > > The decision was essentially Mike would repost his series ASAP with a view > to getting it queued up for v3.4. I think he is also going to get it into > linux-next so at least it gets testing, even if the ultimate decision is to > wait for v3.5. > Hmm...so I'm not sure if some exynos5250 products use v3.4, it can use common struct clk for mass production? If not, I think, this should be kept on v3.4 then it can be changed to use common struct clk from v3.5. > I'm going to rebase my clk series on top of his patches rather that trying OK, sounds good to me. > to merge my temporary versatile-only code. If his series isn't ready to go > in, I can still probably merge parts of the DT clock bindings anyway, but I'll > need to do some cherry picking to do so. > If any branch is ready for it, please let me know. > The rough notes can be found here: > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linux-linaro/+spec/linaro-kernel-q112-maintainer-summit-1 > Thanks for your sharing. OK, I and my team will follow up 'common struct clk' for exynos5250 and it will be done maybe next week. And since I need to implement other features for exynos5250 now, firstly let me use this and test this series in linux-next in a day. Of course, if any updates, let you know. Ah, one more, would be better to us if arm-soc tree could provide the topic branch for 'common struct clk' working as a base. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |