On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 05:47:48AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Saturday 11 February 2012, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 08:07:08PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > what the risk is in changing exynos4 at the same time. It would > > > be great if we can have all exynos use the common struct clk in 3.4, > > > but I'm also happy if we just get exynos5 to do it that way from the > > > beginning and move exynos4 over in 3.5 after you have had a chance > > > to make sure everything still works. > > > > Are we likely to get the common struct clk in 3.4? It's all been > > extremely quiet on that front except for complaints about the lack of > > progress. > > Yes, we discussed it during the subarch maintainers meeting at Linaro > Connect last week and it looks like we're finally going forward on > this now. Maybe Grant or Mike are better at explaining the current > status regarding the clk implementation and bindings. That would be good for those who weren't there to be updated with what was discussed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |