On Saturday 11 February 2012, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 08:07:08PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > what the risk is in changing exynos4 at the same time. It would > > be great if we can have all exynos use the common struct clk in 3.4, > > but I'm also happy if we just get exynos5 to do it that way from the > > beginning and move exynos4 over in 3.5 after you have had a chance > > to make sure everything still works. > > Are we likely to get the common struct clk in 3.4? It's all been > extremely quiet on that front except for complaints about the lack of > progress. Yes, we discussed it during the subarch maintainers meeting at Linaro Connect last week and it looks like we're finally going forward on this now. Maybe Grant or Mike are better at explaining the current status regarding the clk implementation and bindings. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |