Kyungmin Park wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Kyungmin Park wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > > Hi, > > > >> I think we made some conclusion. first apply the current style and > >> improve it later for consistency. > >> > > Yeah, we should decide for this. > > > > However, it's expected following problem with current I2C style. > > > > Suppose A board want to use only I2C0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 7 as I2C and B board want > > to use all of I2C channels as I2C. If use one kernel image for A and B, > > maybe selected all I2C channels. It can be happened the some problem about > > I2C5 and I2C6 on A board when it used for other purpose. > > It's handled by platform_device id. Even though turn on all I2C. A > board don't register 5 or 6 then no configure any GPIOs. > Yes, you're right. Please kindly ignore it. > > > > Of course can happen regardless of number of I2C channel, but if more I2C > > channels, the probability can be increased. > > > > Anyway I know Mr. Han is preparing I2C patches for it and almost done. > > How about continuing discussion for this after submitting it? > > > > I think we have some time that talk about this issue. > > Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |