Kyungmin Park wrote: > > Hi, > Hi, > I think we made some conclusion. first apply the current style and > improve it later for consistency. > Yeah, we should decide for this. However, it's expected following problem with current I2C style. Suppose A board want to use only I2C0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 7 as I2C and B board want to use all of I2C channels as I2C. If use one kernel image for A and B, maybe selected all I2C channels. It can be happened the some problem about I2C5 and I2C6 on A board when it used for other purpose. Of course can happen regardless of number of I2C channel, but if more I2C channels, the probability can be increased. Anyway I know Mr. Han is preparing I2C patches for it and almost done. How about continuing discussion for this after submitting it? I think we have some time that talk about this issue. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |