On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Kyungmin Park wrote: >> >> Hi, >> > Hi, > >> I think we made some conclusion. first apply the current style and >> improve it later for consistency. >> > Yeah, we should decide for this. > > However, it's expected following problem with current I2C style. > > Suppose A board want to use only I2C0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 7 as I2C and B board want > to use all of I2C channels as I2C. If use one kernel image for A and B, > maybe selected all I2C channels. It can be happened the some problem about > I2C5 and I2C6 on A board when it used for other purpose. It's handled by platform_device id. Even though turn on all I2C. A board don't register 5 or 6 then no configure any GPIOs. > > Of course can happen regardless of number of I2C channel, but if more I2C > channels, the probability can be increased. > > Anyway I know Mr. Han is preparing I2C patches for it and almost done. > How about continuing discussion for this after submitting it? > > I think we have some time that talk about this issue. > > Thanks. > > Best regards, > Kgene. > -- > Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer, > SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |