On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 11:18:39 +0200 Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: FWIW, I've created a new vfio-ccw-staging branch where I plan to collect patches prior to putting together a pull request. (I assume I'm still the only vfio-ccw maintainer with a kernel.org account, right?) The idea is that this branch can collect patches that are fine but are targeted to a later release (fixes would still go via the normal vfio-ccw branch.) Let me know whether that sounds reasonable. > VFIO_CCW_STATE_BOXED and VFIO_CCW_STATE_BUSY have > identical actions for the same events. > > Let's merge both into a single state to simplify the code. > We choose to keep VFIO_CCW_STATE_BUSY. > > Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c | 7 +------ > drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h | 1 - > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) Thanks, queued to vfio-ccw-staging.
